To publish – a lot – or not to publish a lot


This little nugget of journalistic click-bait caught my eye the other day, and I set it aside for a response. Lorraine Devon Wilke (a great Huffington post writer) has a beef with writers who publish multiple titles in a year (she specifically is against publishing four books in a year.) You can read the article HERE, but I’ll summarize that she thinks publishing in volume causes the writing to suffer and as artists, writers should take more care in their craft. She references writers who take decades to write one book, and Harper Lee publishing one work in her lifetime (plus that one we won’t talk about.)

Here’s the thing: many writers, want to be writers and eat. So it might just be that to make a living, a writer needs to write more than one magnificent piece of literary fiction every seven years, and instead write two or three or four pieces of genre fiction in a year (a market that actually sells books) and have that be their “day job.” Like Russell Blake, who according to the Wall Street Journal, published 25 novels in 30 months and parlayed that in to a gig co-writing for Clive Cussler. Not bad, when you also consider that Blake did this living on the beach in Baja Mexico.

When I went back to read Ms. Wilke’s article for the purposes of writing this blog-post, she’d added a “clarification” that basically walked back everything she said in the article. I know, I know, her job was to write a sharp piece criticizing all these people are self-publishing multiple novels that don’t overwhelm us with artful prose. Has she read anything that the big publishers are putting out? I’m sure she has. Is there a difference anymore? There’s a little book called The Martian, that was self published. It’s also going to be the #1 movie this weekend and win a few Oscars.

I read an interview with John Grisham where he explained that he wrote his books in 3-4 months, then it went to the editor while he figured out what his next book would be and outlined that book. Once his editor was done, he’d put on the finishing touches, they’d release it, he’d do a book tour and start the process again. A book a year. I would bet that if the economics forced the situation, he could do two in a year. Once you sell a movie deal or two, you don’t need write as much, and that’s what we’re all hoping to do.

In fact, it appears that Lorraine Devon Wilke understands this dynamic well. She’s a terrific writer. I happen to love the Huffington Post and her work stands out. But she’s also got some fluff in there. And, lo and behold, she wrote a GREAT article about the time a bookstore rejected carrying her book because it came from Amazon’s print arm – CreateSpace. In fact, it appears that Wilke is just like the writers she’s taking to task. If she ever stumbles across this little piece of criticism, I hope she understands that every writer’s most precious resource is time. I’d also love for her to read my book and review it honestly on Amazon. It took me over a year to write, work with an editor, and publish (while focusing on my paying job.)

And I’m available if she’d like to interview me for her next column. The Huffington Post has a few more readers than I do. (Hey, Lorraine, email me at

Thanks for reading. Sign up for update on the left and never miss a post. If your name isn’t Lorraine, you can still email me. I’ll be speaking Monday, Oct. 5, at the Mirror Lake Library in St. Pete, where I’ll talk more about how getting noticed as a writer is changing.


One thought on “To publish – a lot – or not to publish a lot

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s